Gynecology Oncology
Ganesalingam Murali; CheeMeng Yong; Nagandla Kavitha; Chew Hua Yeoh
Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 26 March 2024
Abstract
Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a surgical procedure that requires an en-bloc excision of lower abdominopelvic structures. Despite its high morbidity, PE is most indicated for treatment of advanced primary or locally recurrent pelvic cancers. We aim to evaluate our experience with PE for patients with gynaecological ...
Read More
Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a surgical procedure that requires an en-bloc excision of lower abdominopelvic structures. Despite its high morbidity, PE is most indicated for treatment of advanced primary or locally recurrent pelvic cancers. We aim to evaluate our experience with PE for patients with gynaecological cancers over 8 years from January 2011 to 31 December 2019 that were identified through hospital databases. Patient demographic characteristics, indications, surgical characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively assessed. Overall survival (OS) was analysed with Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model survival outcomes. Twenty- one patients were identified with recurrent cervical, endometrial, ovarian and, or vaginal cancer underwent PE. Local disease recurrence was the most common indication in 80.9%. The primary tumor origin was the cervix in 80.9%, followed by endometrial origin 9.5%. PE was performed as curative intent in 62% and in 38% as palliative intent. The most common early complication was wound infections and late complications included deep vein thrombosis, lymphocyst and recurrent urinary tract infections. The median survival at 6 months is 85.7% and 12 months is 57.1 %. Our five-year OS was 54.3 % (95% CI 34.2, 74.6). Our case series illustrates pelvic exenteration provides about 54.3% of 5-year survival chance in a selected group of patients. The early-and late complications rate are similar to those described historically. Pelvic exenteration results in sustained survival in selected patients and continued efforts must focus on identifying those patients who could potentially benefit most from PE.
Gynecology Oncology
Ghodratolah Maddah; Mohammad Ali Mohammadzadeh Rezae; Zohreh Yousefi; Helena Azimi; Leila Mousavi Seresht
Volume 8, Issue 4 , July and August 2023, , Pages 411-416
Abstract
Background & Objective: Pelvic exenteration and other types of super-radical procedures are the standard of care in the management of patients with recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. But, since the extent of surgery and possible morbidities are considered as an important challenge in low-resource ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Pelvic exenteration and other types of super-radical procedures are the standard of care in the management of patients with recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. But, since the extent of surgery and possible morbidities are considered as an important challenge in low-resource countries, there is need to investigate the outcomes of similar patient.Materials & Methods: The present study tries to report the successful outcome of radical surgery in detailed in 7 cases in a low-economic setting.Results: Total Pelvic exenteration was performed in three but free margin could be achieved by less radical approach in others. All were alive up to 5yaers of follow-up.Conclusion: What we had noticed was the excellent survival prognosis even in curative intent. It is highly recommended, considering the psychological effect of such an extensive surgery and quality of life in these patients with advanced disease and loss of hope.
