Write your message
Volume 4, Issue 4 (Fall 2019)                   J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res 2019, 4(4): 146-150 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nouri B, pooransari P, Ghorbani F. Evaluation of Epidemiology and Etiology of Cesarean Hystrectomy. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2019; 4 (4) :146-150
URL: http://jogcr.com/article-1-258-en.html
Abstract:   (372 Views)

Background & Objective: Cesarean hysterectomy is a major surgical risk happening in the setting of life threatening hemorrhagic events during or immediately after the cesarean section. In this study we assessed patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomy to determine their general and clinical characteristics.
Materials & Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 34 consecutive patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomy in training hospitals in Tehran, Iran, from 2016 to 2017 were enrolled. The age, BMI, gravid, parity, Apgar score, risk factors, chief complaints, drug history, and previous medical and surgical history were assessed and finally the preventability rate was determined.
Results: The chief complaint was vaginal leak (VL), abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), labor pain, and preeclampsia in 38.2%, 29.4%, 14.7%, and 2.9% of patients respectively, and the other patients had more than one complaint. Type of surgery was total, and supra-cervical in 58.8%, 41.2% of patients respectively. Bladder injury occurred in 41.2% of patients. Two cases were preventable, one was non-preventable, and all others were mixed.
Conclusion:  It may be concluded that the general characteristics among our patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomy is similar to those reported by similar studies. However further studies with larger sample size and multi-center sampling among Iranian patients are needed to develop more definite results.

Full-Text [PDF 256 kb]   (160 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (63 Views)  
Systematic Review: Original Research | Subject: Obstetrics and Gynecology
Received: 2020/04/6 | Accepted: 2020/05/2 | Published: 2020/05/2

References
1. Clark SL, Yeh SY, Phelan JP, Bruce S, Paul RH. Emergency hysterectomy for obstetric hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Sep;64(3):376-80.
2. Briery CM, Rose CH, Hudson WT, Lutgendorf MA, Magann EF, Chauhan SP, et al. Planned vs emergent cesarean hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(2):154.e1-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.026] [PMID]
3. Gonsoulin W, Kennedy RT, Guidry KH. Elective versus emergency cesarean hysterectomy cases in a residency program setting: a review of 129 cases from 1984 to 1988. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(1):91-4. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(91)90231-F]
4. Matsubara S, Kuwata T, Usui R, Watanabe T, Izumi A, Ohkuchi A, et al. Important surgical measures and techniques at cesarean hysterectomy for placenta previa accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(4):372-7. [DOI:10.1111/aogs.12074] [PMID]
5. Haynes DM, Martin BJ Jr. Cesarean hysterectomy: a twenty-five-year review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134(4):393-8. [DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(16)33081-2]
6. Barclay DL, Hawks BL, Frueh DM, Power JD, Struble RH. Elective cesarean hysterectomy: a 5 year comparison with cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Apr 15;124(8):900-11. [DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(16)33394-4]
7. Lee IH, Son JH, Shin YC, Byun JH, Yoon HJ, Jee YS. Anesthetic review of emergency peripartum hysterectomy following vaginal and cesarean delivery: a retrospective study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Jul;63(1):43. [DOI:10.4097/kjae.2012.63.1.43] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Soderstrom RM, Stipp CG. Cesarean hysterectomy: a safe procedure. West J Surg Obstet Gynecol. 1962;70:150
9. Kong X, Kong Y, Yan J, Hu JJ, Wang FF, Zhang L. On opportunity for emergency cesarean hysterectomy and pregnancy outcomes of patients with placenta accreta. Medicine. 2017 Sep;96(39). [DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000007930] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Tapisiz OL, Altinbas SK, Yirci B, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital in Ankara, Turkey: a 5-year review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Nov 1;286(5):1131-4. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-012-2434-z] [PMID]
11. Shellhaas CS, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. The frequency and complication rates of hysterectomy accompanying cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):224. [DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ad9442] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Chawla J, Arora D, Paul M, Ajmani SN. Emergency Obstetric Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study from a Teaching Hospital in North India over Eight Years. Oman Med J. 2015 May;30(3):181. [DOI:10.5001/omj.2015.39] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Stivanello E, Knight M, Dallolio L, Frammartino B, Rizzo N, Fantini MP. Peripartum hysterectomy and cesarean delivery: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Mar 1;89(3):321-7. [DOI:10.3109/00016340903508627] [PMID]
14. Zhang Y, Yan J, Han Q, Yang T, Cai L, Fu Y, Cai X, Guo M. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy for life-threatening postpartum hemorrhage: A 12-year review. Medicine. 2017 Nov;96(45). [DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000008443] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Orbach A, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Mazor M, Holcberg G, Sheiner E. Peripartum cesarean hysterectomy: critical analysis of risk factors and trends over the years. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Mar [DOI:10.3109/14767058.2010.501128] [PMID]
16. Van den Akker T, Bobbel C, Dekkers OM, Bloemenkamp KW. Prevalence, Indications,Risk Indicators , and Outcomes of Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy World W ide :A systemuv Review and Meta -analysis Obesterics and Gynecology 2016;128(6):1281-94. [DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001736] [PMID]
17. Ghotbzadeh Vahdani F, Hantoushzadeh S, Deldar Pakestani M,Ghamari A,Hajatpour M,Panahi Z .Cesarean Hysterectomy Dut to Abnormal Placentation: Mortality and Morbidity in a Teritiary Center. Jogcr.2019;4(2):51-56. [DOI:10.30699/jogcr.4.2.51]
18. Garmi G, Salim R.Etiologt ,Diagnosis ,and Management of Placenta Accreta.Obestetric and Gynecology International,2012,Article ID 873929,7 [DOI:10.1155/2012/873929] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. D Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentationb using ultrasound :Systemic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013 Nov,42(5):509-17. [DOI:10.1002/uog.13194] [PMID]
20. Jauniaux E,Bhide A. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta accrete after cesarean delivery: Asystematic review and meta-analysis .Am J Obestet Gynecol .2017 Jul;217(1):27-36 [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.050] [PMID]
21. Jauniaux E, Bide A, Kennedy A, Woodward P, Hubinont C, Collins S .FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accrete spectrum disorders :prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018; 140: 274-280 [DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12408] [PMID]
22. Liu B, Deng S, Lin M, Chen Y, Cai J, Yang J, Zhang J, Cui J, Shen L, Xie H, Wang Z. Prediction of cesarean hysterectomy in placenta previa complicated with prior cesarean: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):81. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-020-2790-9] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Klewitz J, Struebing C, Rohn K, Goergens A, Martinsson G, Orgies F, Probst J, Hollinshead F, Bollwein H, Sieme H. Effects of age, parity, and pregnancy abnormalities on foal birth weight and uterine blood flow in the mare. Theriogenology. 2015 Mar 1;83(4):721-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.11.007] [PMID]
24. Varghese B, Singh N, George RA, Gilvaz S. Magnetic resonance imaging of placenta accreta. Ind J of Radiol Imag. 2013 Oct;23(4):379. [DOI:10.4103/0971-3026.125592] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research (JOGCR)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Piblisher: Farname Inc.