Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Wed, Jul 28, 2021
[Archive]
Volume 6, Issue 2 (Spring 2021)
J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res 2021, 6(2): 81-86 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rashidi Fakari F, Simbar M, Tahmasebi G, Ebadi A, Rashidi Fakari F, Nasiri M et al . Efficacy of Working Ability, Location, Intensity, Days of Pain, Dysmenorrhea (WaLIDD) and Verbal Rating Scale (Pain and Drug) in Diagnosing and Predicting Severity of Dysmenorrhea among Adolescents: A Comparative Study. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2021; 6 (2) :81-86
URL: http://jogcr.com/article-1-329-en.html
URL: http://jogcr.com/article-1-329-en.html
Farzaneh Rashidi Fakari1 
, Masoumeh Simbar * 2, Golshan Tahmasebi3 , Abbas Ebadi4, Fahimeh Rashidi Fakari5 , Malihe Nasiri6 , Masumeh Ghazanfarpour7
, Masoumeh Simbar * 2, Golshan Tahmasebi3 , Abbas Ebadi4, Fahimeh Rashidi Fakari5 , Malihe Nasiri6 , Masumeh Ghazanfarpour7
1- Department of Midwifery, School of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran
2- Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , rashidiff@gmail.com
3- MSc in Midwifery, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Nursing, Lifestyle Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5- Student Research Committee, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6- Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
7- PhD, Student Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2- Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , rashidiff@gmail.com
3- MSc in Midwifery, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Nursing, Lifestyle Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5- Student Research Committee, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6- Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
7- PhD, Student Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Abstract: (559 Views)
Background: Menstruation with cramping pain is one of the problems that appear during adolescence. The severity of dysmenorrhea affects the extent of activity limitation. Given the high prevalence of dysmenorrhea in adolescents and the personal-social effect of this condition on their daily lives, using reliable tools for assessing the severity of this condition in different populations of different countries can significantly contribute to the standard diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of people suffering from dysmenorrhea.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on a population of adolescent girls (Iran) in 2019. The research was approved and monitored by the relevant supervisory body, which issued the pertinent ethics licenses and letters of introduction. Sampling was performed using the cluster method from public schools. Inclusion criteria were Iranian nationality and not having any underlying diseases. The exclusion criterion was the unwillingness to continue participation. The data collection tools were a questionnaire of demographic and menstrual information as well as verbal rating scale (VRS; for both drug and pain) and working ability, location, intensity, days of pain, dysmenorrhea (WaLIDD) questionnaires.
Results: The participants had a mean age of 15.6±2.3 years and a mean age of menarche of 12.5±1.3 years. The best sensitivity and specificity of the tools were respectively calculated as 63.7% and 56.9% for WaLIDD (at point 4.5), 57.3% and 70.8% for VRS (pain; at point 1.5), and 33.9% and 72.2% for VRS (drug; at point 0.5).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, none of the tools had high specificity and sensitivity at the same time. However, WaLIDD had high sensitivity, and VRS (for both pain and drug) exhibited high specificity.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on a population of adolescent girls (Iran) in 2019. The research was approved and monitored by the relevant supervisory body, which issued the pertinent ethics licenses and letters of introduction. Sampling was performed using the cluster method from public schools. Inclusion criteria were Iranian nationality and not having any underlying diseases. The exclusion criterion was the unwillingness to continue participation. The data collection tools were a questionnaire of demographic and menstrual information as well as verbal rating scale (VRS; for both drug and pain) and working ability, location, intensity, days of pain, dysmenorrhea (WaLIDD) questionnaires.
Results: The participants had a mean age of 15.6±2.3 years and a mean age of menarche of 12.5±1.3 years. The best sensitivity and specificity of the tools were respectively calculated as 63.7% and 56.9% for WaLIDD (at point 4.5), 57.3% and 70.8% for VRS (pain; at point 1.5), and 33.9% and 72.2% for VRS (drug; at point 0.5).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, none of the tools had high specificity and sensitivity at the same time. However, WaLIDD had high sensitivity, and VRS (for both pain and drug) exhibited high specificity.
Keywords: |Dysmenorrhea|Diagnosis|Adolescent ,
Systematic Review: Original Research |
Subject:
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Received: 2021/01/4 | Accepted: 2021/02/20 | Published: 2021/05/5
Received: 2021/01/4 | Accepted: 2021/02/20 | Published: 2021/05/5
References
1. Chen C, Kwekkeboom K, Ward SJEJoP. Self‐report pain and symptom measures for primary dysmenorrhoea: A critical review. 2015;19(3):377-91. [DOI:10.1002/ejp.556] [PMID]
2. Davis AR, Westhoff CLJJop, gynecology a. Primary dysmenorrhea in adolescent girls and treatment with oral contraceptives. 2001;14(1):3-8. [DOI:10.1016/S1083-3188(00)00076-0]
3. Karthik C, Preetha S, Priya JJDIT. Impact of dysmenorrhea on academic performance in college girls. 2018;10(11).
4. Bahrami A, Sadeghnia H, Avan A, Mirmousavi SJ, Moslem A, Eslami S, et al. Neuropsychological function in relation to dysmenorrhea in adolescents. 2017;215:224-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.030] [PMID]
5. Osayande AS, Mehulic SJAfp. Diagnosis and initial management of dysmenorrhea. 2014;89(5):341-6.
6. Dawood MYJTAjom. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and changing attitudes toward dysmenorrhea. 1988;84(5):23-9. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(88)90473-1]
7. Burnett MA, Antao V, Black A, Feldman K, Grenville A, Lea R, et al. Prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea in Canada. 2005;27(8):765-70. [DOI:10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30728-9]
8. Harada T, Momoeda M, Terakawa N, Taketani Y, Hoshiai HJF, sterility. Evaluation of a low-dose oral contraceptive pill for primary dysmenorrhea: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial. 2011;95(6):1928-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.045] [PMID]
9. Larroy CJBM. Comparing visual-analog and numeric scales for assessing menstrual pain. 2002;27(4):179-81. [DOI:10.1080/08964280209596043] [PMID]
10. Helwa HAA, Mitaeb AA, Al-Hamshri S, Sweileh WMJBwsh. Prevalence of dysmenorrhea and predictors of its pain intensity among Palestinian female university students. 2018;18(1):18. [DOI:10.1186/s12905-018-0516-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Lewers D, Clelland JA, Jackson JR, Varner RE, Bergman JJPT. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the relief of primary dysmenorrhea. 1989;69(1):3-9. [DOI:10.1093/ptj/69.1.3] [PMID]
12. Chen HM, Chen CHJJoan. Effects of acupressure at the Sanyinjiao point on primary dysmenorrhoea. 2004;48(4):380-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03236.x] [PMID]
13. Kahl C, Cleland JAJPtr. Visual analogue scale, numeric pain rating scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire: an overview of psychometric properties. 2005;10(2):123-8. [DOI:10.1179/108331905X55776]
14. Teherán AA, Piñeros LG, Pulido F, Guatibonza MCMJIjowsh. WalIDD score, a new tool to diagnose dysmenorrhea and predict medical leave in university students. 2018;10:35. [DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S143510] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver SJP. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. 1986;27(1):117-26. [DOI:10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9]
16. Teherán AA, Pineros LG, Pulido F, Guatibonza MCM. WalIDD score, a new tool to diagnose dysmenorrhea and predict medical leave in university students. International journal of women's health. 2018;10:35. [DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S143510] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Kharaghani R, Damghanian M. The prevalence of dysmenorrhea in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2017. [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.40856]
18. Jensen MP. Hypnosis for chronic pain management: Therapist guide: Oxford University Press; 2011. [DOI:10.1093/med:psych/9780199772377.001.0001]
19. Atallahi M, Akbari SAA, Mojab F, Majd HAJIRCMJ. Effects of wheat germ extract on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized controlled clinical trial. 2014;16(8). [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.19503] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Rad HA, Basirat Z, Bakouei F, Moghadamnia AA, Khafri S, Kotenaei ZF, et al. Effect of ginger and novafen on menstrual pain: A cross-over trial. 2018;57(6):806-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2018.10.006] [PMID]
21. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al. Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. 2011;41(6):1073-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016] [PMID]
22. Williamson A, Hoggart BJJocn. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. 2005;14(7):798-804. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x] [PMID]
23. Zahedifard T, Firozi MJTIJoO, Gynecology, Infertility. Assessment of the articles related to primary dysmenorrhea in dimension of menstrual pain assessment tools. 2016;19(4):17-27.
24. Aziato L, Dedey F, Marfo K, Asamani JA, Clegg-Lamptey JNAJBn. Validation of three pain scales among adult postoperative patients in Ghana. 2015;14(1):42. [DOI:10.1186/s12912-015-0094-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Younger J, McCue R, Mackey SJCp, reports h. Pain outcomes: a brief review of instruments and techniques. 2009;13(1):39-43. [DOI:10.1007/s11916-009-0009-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
Send email to the article author
Copyright Policy
Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research by Farname Inc is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://jogcr.com/.
