Write your message
Volume 7, Issue 3 (May & June 2022)                   J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res 2022, 7(3): 230-234 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nouri B, Sarani S, Arab M, Bakhtiari M, Sarbazi F, Karimi A. Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Laparotomic Surgery for Adnexal Masses. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2022; 7 (3) :230-234
URL: http://jogcr.com/article-1-422-en.html
1- Preventative Gynecology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical, Tehran, Iran , nouri@sbmu.com
2- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shohaday-e Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Gynecology-Oncology, Imam Hossein Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Farmanieh Hospital, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (584 Views)

Background and Objectives: Adnexal masses are among the most important neoplastic lesions observed in women. Considering different results of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for adnexal masses, this study compared the surgical consequences of laparoscopy and laparotomy of adnexal masses.
Methods: This prospective observational study was performed on females aged 10 to 75 years with adnexal mass referred to the gynecology clinic of Shohaday-e Tajrish Hospital (2019-2020) by convenience sampling. A total of 34 patients in the laparoscopy group and 29 patients in the laparotomy group were included in the study. SPSS  25 was used for data analysis.
Results: The mean duration of surgery and anesthesia in laparoscopic patients was significantly more than in the laparotomy patients (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between patients in the two groups in terms of complications during surgery (P=0.62). The mean of pre-discharge pain (based on scoring from 1 to 10) in laparoscopic patients was significantly lower than in the laparotomy group (3.5 ± 1.2 and 6.7 ± 1.0, respectively, P<0.001). The mean length of hospital stay after surgery was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group compared with the laparotomy group (29 ± 9 hours and 44 ± 7 hours, respectively, P<0.001).
Conclusion: Although the use of laparoscopy in adnexal masses is associated with a longer duration of surgery and anesthesia, due to the shorter hospital stay, it can be concluded that the use of laparoscopy in adnexal masses is better than laparotomy.

Full-Text [PDF 208 kb]   (110 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (116 Views)  
Systematic Review: Original Research | Subject: Gynecology Oncology
Received: 2021/06/13 | Accepted: 2021/10/29 | Published: 2022/01/12

References
1. Pulcinelli FM, Schimberni M, Marci R, Bellati F, Caserta D. Laparoscopic versus laparotomic surgery for adnexal masses: role in elderly. World J Surg Onc. 2016;14(1):1-5. [DOI:10.1186/s12957-016-0861-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Hoorsan H, Majd HA, Chaichian S, Mehdizadehkashi A, Hoorsan R, Moradi Y. Maternal anthropometric characteristics and adverse pregnancy outcomes in iranian women: A confirmation analysis. Arch Iran Med. 2018;21(2):61-6.
3. Ye P, Zhao N, Shu J, Shen H, Wang Y, Chen L, et al. Laparoscopy versus open surgery for adnexal masses in pregnancy: a meta-analytic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(3):625-34. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-018-05039-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Casarin J, Laganà AS, Uccella S, Cromi A, Pinelli C, et al. Surgical treatment of large adnexal masses: a retrospective analysis of 330 consecutive cases. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020;29(6):366-74. [DOI:10.1080/13645706.2019.1649700] [PMID]
5. Rauh-Hain JA, Melamed A, Buskwofie A, Schorge JO. Adnexal mass in the postmenopausal patient. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(1):53-65. [DOI:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000085] [PMID]
6. Mohan S, Kapoor G, Nagpal PK, Aggarwal R, Gami N. Managing adnexal masses: a medical quandary. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2013;7(9):1971. [DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2013/6243.3372] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 174: evaluation and management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(5):e210-26. [DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001768] [PMID]
8. Pittaway DE, Takacs P, Bauguess P. Laparoscopic adnexectomy: a comparison with laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(2):385-91. [DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70039-7]
9. Cagino K, Li X, Thomas C, Delgado D, Christos P, Acholonu Jr U. Surgical Management of Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jan 28. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2021.01.020] [PMID]
10. Nouri B, Baghestani A R, Pooransari P. Evening Primrose versus Misoprostol for Cervical Dilatation before Gynecologic Surgeries; a Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2021; 6 (2):87-94. [DOI:10.30699/jogcr.6.2.87]
11. KOO YJ, Kim HJ, LIM KT, LEE IH, LEE KH, SHIM JU, et al. Laparotomy versus laparoscopy for the treatment of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(1):34-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01380.x] [PMID]
12. Safari S, Zali A, Pezeshgi P, Bastanhagh E, Jahangirifard A. Neuroprotective Strategies in the Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review. J Cell Mol Anesth.;6(1):50-65.
13. D'Ambrosio V, Brunelli R, Musacchio L, Del Negro V, Vena F, Boccuzzi G, et al. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: an updated review on diagnosis and treatment. Tumori J. 2020:0300891620909144. [DOI:10.1177/0300891620909144] [PMID]
14. Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, Fachel JM, Furness S, Garry R, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(2). [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004751.pub3] [PMID]
15. Li M. 2347 A Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Laparotomy Management for Adnexal Masses During Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study With 16-Year Experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(7):S107. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.100]
16. Minig L, Otaño L, Cruz P, Patrono MG, Botazzi C, Zapardiel I. Laparoscopic surgery for treating adnexal masses during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12(1):22. [DOI:10.4103/0972-9941.171960] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research by Farname Inc is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jogcr.com/.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research (JOGCR)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Piblisher: Farname Inc.