Enter your email address
Submit
Write your message
Fri, May 20, 2022
[Archive]
Volume 7, Issue 3 (May & June 2022)
J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res 2022, 7(3): 186-191 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ahmadi S, Farahani K, Aklamli M, Ahmadi K, Beheshti N. Spinal Analgesia in Labor on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cross Sectional Study. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2022; 7 (3) :186-191
URL: http://jogcr.com/article-1-444-en.html
URL: http://jogcr.com/article-1-444-en.html
1- Department of Gynecology Oncology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran , ahmadishahnaz2005@yahoo.com
2- Department of Gynecology Oncology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Computer Sciences ,School of Mathematical Science, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
2- Department of Gynecology Oncology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Computer Sciences ,School of Mathematical Science, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
Abstract: (587 Views)
Background & Objective: Spinal analgesia and Entonox analgesia are used as pain relief methods during labor. This cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the effect of spinal analgesia and Entonox analgesia on the duration of the first, second, and third stages of labor, Apgar score, and maternal and fetal outcomes.
Materials & Methods: Clinical information of 1,000 patients who delivered at Shahid Akbarabadi Hospital and underwent painless delivery with Entonox gas and spinal anesthesia was assessed; then, according to the inclusion criteria, 280 cases were divided into two groups: the spinal analgesia group (n=140) and Entonox analgesia group (n=140). In the spinal analgesia group, 25 μg of fentanyl and 1-2 mg of bupivacaine were administered. For the Entonox group, Entonox inhalation was administered via a face mask at the initiation of pain at each contraction. The duration of labor, mode of delivery, side effects, and maternal satisfaction were also compared in the two groups.
Results: The duration of the first stage was significantly shorter in the spinal analgesia group than in the Entonox analgesia group (P<0.001), but the duration of the second stage in the spinal analgesia group was longer (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in the cesarean section rates, Apgar score, weight, and acidity (PH) and the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) between the two groups. Measured pain was significantly lower in the spinal analgesia group (P=0.01) than in the Entonox analgesia group regarding visual analog scale (VAS) scores.
Conclusion: Spinal analgesia is a safe, suitable, and effective method for pain reduction with no adverse effects on the outcome of labor compared to Entonox analgesia.
Systematic Review: Original Research |
Subject:
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Received: 2021/07/16 | Accepted: 2021/09/7 | Published: 2022/01/12
Received: 2021/07/16 | Accepted: 2021/09/7 | Published: 2022/01/12
References
1. Whitburn LY, Jones LE, Davey M-A, McDonald S. The nature of labour pain: An updated review of the literature. Women and Birth. 2019;32(1):28-38. [DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.03.004] [PMID]
2. Aziato L, Acheampong AK, Umoar KL. Labour pain experiences and perceptions: a qualitative study among post-partum women in Ghana. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-017-1248-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Czech I, Fuchs P, Fuchs A, Lorek M, Tobolska-Lorek D, Drosdzol-Cop A, et al. Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Methods of Labour Pain Relief-Establishment of Effectiveness and Comparison. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):2792. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph15122792] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Akadri AA, Odelola OI. Labour pain perception: experiences of Nigerian mothers. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;30(1):288. [DOI:10.11604/pamj.2018.30.288.16672] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Tan DJA, Sultana R, Han NLR, Sia ATH, Sng BL. Investigating determinants for patient satisfaction in women receiving epidural analgesia for labour pain: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18(1):50. [DOI:10.1186/s12871-018-0514-8] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Shen X, Li Y, Xu S, Wang N, Fan S, Qin X, et al. Epidural Analgesia During the Second Stage of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):1097-103. [DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002306] [PMID]
7. Aasheim V, Nilsen RM, Vik ES, Small R, Schytt E. Epidural analgesia for labour pain in nulliparous women in Norway in relation to maternal country of birth and migration related factors. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020;26:100553. [DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100553] [PMID]
8. Babazade R, Saasouh W, Naylor AJ, Makarova N, Udeh CI, Turan A, et al. The cost-effectiveness of epidural, patient-controlled intravenous opioid analgesia, or transversus abdominis plane infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain management. J Clin Anesth. 2019;53:56-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.003] [PMID]
9. Wang TT, Sun S, Huang SQ. Effects of Epidural Labor Analgesia With Low Concentrations of Local Anesthetics on Obstetric Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(5):1571-80. [DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001709] [PMID]
10. Kamali A, Akbari S, Norouzi A, Shokrpour M. painless labor with epidural & spinal analgesia.
11. Ji J-W, Xu M-J, Han B, Chen L, Mu X-J. Feasibility study on continuous spinal analgesia in all stages of labor. Chinese Med J. 2020;133(5):618. [DOI:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000661] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Imani F, Lotfi S, Aminisaman J, Shahmohamadi A, Ahmadi A. Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(1):e108335. [DOI:10.5812/aapm.112880]
13. Sharpe EE, Kim GY, Vinzant NJ, Arendt KW, Hanson AC, Martin DP, et al. Need for additional anesthesia after single injection spinal analgesia for labor: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;40:45-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.013] [PMID]
14. Rahmati J, Shahriari M, Shahriari A, Nataj M, Shabani Z, Moodi V. Effectiveness of Spinal Analgesia for Labor Pain Compared with Epidural Analgesia. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(2):e113350. [DOI:10.5812/aapm.113350] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. KHARODE A, SHRIVASTAVA D. MATERNAL AND FOETAL OUTCOME OF SINGLE DOSE SPINAL ANALGESIA FOR LABOUR PAINS.
16. Gupta S, Partani S. Neuraxial techniques of labour analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(9):658-66. [DOI:10.4103/ija.IJA_445_18] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Nejmark MI, Ivanova O. Neuroaxial methods analgesia of labour. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2020;14(1):19-25. [DOI:10.17816/1993-6508-2020-14-1-19-25]
18. DeLeon AM, CA. W. Spinal anesthesia: Technique. U: UpToDate, Maniker R ed. UpToDate [Internet]. Waltham: UpToDate. 2020.
19. Manouchehrian N, Rabiei S, Moradi A, Lakpur Z. Comparison of Intrathecal Injection of Fentanyl and Sufentanil on the Onset, Duration, and Quality of Analgesia in Labor: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2020;10(3):e99843. [DOI:10.5812/aapm.99843] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT, et al. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(7):655-65. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa042573] [PMID]
21. Cheng YW, Caughey AB. Second stage of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(2):227-40. [DOI:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000113] [PMID]
22. Tsen LC. What's new and novel in obstetric anesthesia? Contributions from the 2003 scientific literature. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14(2):126-46. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.007] [PMID]
23. Rad P, Hejr H, Delaviz H, Vanda R. Intrathecal Analgesia Versus Non-analgesia in Labor on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. J clin care skills. 2020;1(1):31-6. [DOI:10.52547/jccs.1.1.31]
24. Rahimi R, Akbarianrad Z, Zahed Pasha Y. The effect of mode of delivery on the umbilical artery pH. Caspian J pediatr. 2016;2(1):113-7.
25. Huang J-H, Yu M, Zhang D-B, Pan J-P, Zhao X-T, Liu Q, et al. The Effects of Epidural Analgesia during Labor on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. 2020. [DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-56782/v1]
26. Akbas M, Akcan AB. Epidural analgesia and lactation. Eurasian J Med. 2011;43(1):45-9. [DOI:10.5152/eajm.2011.09] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Olawin AM, Das JM. Spinal anesthesia. StatPearls [Internet]. 2020.
28. Fathi Najafi T, Asgarian Yazdi M, Mazloom SR. Efficacy of Spinal Analgesia on Stages of Labor 17 Shahrivar Hospital Mashhad-2005. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2007;10(2):55-62.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research by Farname Inc is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jogcr.com/. |
Copyright Policy
Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research by Farname Inc is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://jogcr.com/.
