Write your message
Volume 7, Issue 4 (July & August 2022)                   J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res 2022, 7(4): 272-278 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moradi B, Gity M, Davari Tanha F, Golestani Jahromi M, Fayyazi S. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of TVS (Transvaginal sonography) in the Diagnosis of Pelvic Endometriosis in Comparison with Laparoscopic Evaluation in Patients Referred to the Imaging Center of Imam Khomeini Hospital and Yas Hospital of Tehran in 2018. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2022; 7 (4) :272-278
URL: http://jogcr.com/article-1-497-en.html
1- Department of Radiology, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Medical Imaging Center, Imam Khomeini Complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Radiology, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Medical Imaging Center, Imam Khomeini Complex Hospital, Tehran, Iranp_gity@yahoo.com
3- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Obstetrics & Gynecologist, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Women Hospital (Yas / Mirza Kochak Khan), Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Reproductive Biology Department of Advanced Medical Sciences & Technologies, School of Medicine Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
5- Department of Radiology, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Medical Imaging Center, Imam Khomeini Complex Hospital, Tehran university of medical science, Tehran, Iran Department of radiology, Yas women hospital, Tehran university of medical science, Tehran, Iran , shahrzad.f9099@gmail.com
Abstract:   (501 Views)

Diagnosis of endometriosis according to TVS may be an appropriate alternative method for laparoscopy. Hence in this study, the role of TVS was investigated compared with laparoscopic assessment in cases with pelvic endometriosis attending to imaging center of Imam-Khomeini and Yas Hospital in Tehran in 2018. In this diagnostic study, 69 patients with pelvic endometriosis were assessed. The results of TVS were compared with laparoscopic assessment, and the sensitivity, specificity, and congruence rate were determined. According to the obtained results, it may be concluded that most sensitivity of TVS is related to the torus uterinus and dome of the bladder. Also, the most specificity is related to bladder, sigmoid colon, and peritoneal cyst. The most congruence rate between U/S and laparoscopy is at bladder trigon and sigmoid colon. However, in the end, multicenter studies with more cases and comparisons with the results of other diagnostic methods are recommended to achieve more accurate results.

Full-Text [PDF 345 kb]   (39 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (22 Views)  
Systematic Review: Review | Subject: Radiology
Received: 2021/09/14 | Accepted: 2021/11/20 | Published: 2022/03/14

References
1. Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) levels in young women with endometriosis.Metabolism. 1997 Jul;46(7):735-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90115-3]
2. Pretta S، Remorgida V، Abbamonte LH، Anserini P،Ragni N، Del Sette M، et al. Atherosclerosis in women with endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;132:226-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.015] [PMID]
3. Szczepanska M، Kozlik J، Skrzypczak J، Mikolajczyk M. Oxidative stress may be a piece in the endometriosis puzzle. Fertil Steril. 2003;79: 1288-93. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00266-8]
4. Van Langendonckt A، Casanas-Roux F، Donnez J. Oxidative stress and peritoneal endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2002;77:861-70. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)02959-X]
5. Holland TK, Cutner A, Saridogan E, Mavrelos D, Pateman K, Jurkovic D. Ultrasound mapping of pelvic endometriosis: does the location and number of lesions affect the diagnostic accuracy? A multicentre diagnostic accuracy study. BMC Womens Health. 2013;13:43. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6874-13-43] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Vigano P, Parazzini F, Somigliana E, Vercellini P. Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2004 Apr 30;18(2):177-200. [DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.01.007] [PMID]
7. Chapron C, Vercellini P, Barakat H, Vieira M, Dubuisson JB. Management of ovarian endometriomas. Human reproduction update. 2002 Nov 1;8(6):591-7. [DOI:10.1093/humupd/8.6.591] [PMID]
8. Salehpour S, Zhaam H, Hakimifard M, Khalili L, Azar Gashb Y. Evaluation of Diagnostic Visual Findings at Laparoscopy in Endometriosis. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility. 2007;1(3):123-6
9. Redwine DB, Koning M, Sharpe DR. Laparoscopically assisted transvaginal segmental resection of the rectosigmoid colon for endometriosis. Fertility and sterility. 1996 Jan 31;65(1):193-7. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58051-0]
10. Yuen PM, Yu KM, Yip SK, Lau WC, Rogers MS, Chang A. A randomized prospective study of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the management of benign ovarian masses. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1997 Jul 31;177(1):109-14. [DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70447-2]
11. Adamson GD, Subak LL, Pasta DJ, Hurd SJ, von Franque O, Rodriguez BD. Comparison of CO 2 laser laparoscopy with laparotomy for treatment of endometriomata. Fertility and sterility. 1992 May 31;57(5):965-73. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55010-9]
12. Sawada T, Ohara S, Kawakami S. Laparoscopic surgery vs. laparotomy management for infertile patients with ovarian endometrioma. Gynaecological Endoscopy. 1999 Feb 1;8(1):17-9. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2508.1999.00235.x]
13. Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. The Cochrane Library. 2016 Jan 1. [DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Brosens I, Puttemans P, Campo R, Gordts S, Kinkel K. Diagnosis of endometriosis: pelvic endoscopy and imaging techniques. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2004 Apr 30;18(2):285-303. [DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.03.002] [PMID]
15. Moore J, Copley S, Morris J, Lindsell D, Golding S, Kennedy S. A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. 2002 Dec 1;20(6):630-4. [DOI:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00862.x] [PMID]
16. Kinkel K, Frei KA, Balleyguier C, Chapron C. Diagnosis of endometriosis with imaging: a review. European radiology. 2006 Feb 1;16(2):285-98. [DOI:10.1007/s00330-005-2882-y] [PMID]
17. Abrao MS, Gonçalves MO, Dias Jr JA, Podgaec S, Chamie LP, Blasbalg R. Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Human Reproduction. 2007 Oct 18;22(12):3092-7. [DOI:10.1093/humrep/dem187] [PMID]
18. Alborzi S, Zarei A, Alborzi S, Alborzi M. Management of ovarian endometrioma. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. 2006 Sep 1;49(3):480-91. [DOI:10.1097/00003081-200609000-00008] [PMID]
19. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Cromi A, Duwe DG, Beretta P, Buttarelli M, Mueller MD. "Kissing ovaries": a sonographic sign of moderate to severe endometriosis. Fertility and sterility. 2005 Jan 31;83(1):143-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.094] [PMID]
20. Rauch GM, Kaur H, Choi H, Ernst RD, Klopp AH, Boonsirikamchai P, Westin SN, Marcal LP. Optimization of MR imaging for pretreatment evaluation of patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. Radiographics. 2014 Jul 14;34(4):1082-98. [DOI:10.1148/rg.344140001] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Said TH, Azzam AZ. Prediction of endometriosis by transvaginal ultrasound in reproductive-age women with normal ovarian size. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2014 Sep 30;19(3):197-207. [DOI:10.1016/j.mefs.2013.11.003]
22. Sehgal V, Delproposto Z, Haacke EM, Tong KA, Wycliffe N, Kido DK, Xu Y, Neelavalli J, Haddar D, Reichenbach JR. Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2005 Oct 1;22(4):439-50. [DOI:10.1002/jmri.20404] [PMID]
23. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H. Susceptibility-weighted MRI of endometrioma: preliminary results. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008 Nov;191(5):1366-70. [DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3974] [PMID]
24. Tadros MY, Keriakos NN. Diffusion MRI versus ultrasound in superficial and deep endometriosis. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2016 Dec 31;47(4):1765-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.07.011]
25. Endometriosis - morphology, clinical presentations and molecular pathology. J Lab Physicians. 2010 Jan;2(1):1-9.
26. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(5):261-75. [DOI:10.1038/nrendo.2013.255] [PMID]
27. Rahmani M, Moradi B, Gity M, Chavoshi M, Hantoushzadeh S, Kazemi Aski S, et al . Clinical characteristics, CT features and perinatal outcome of COVID-19 pneumonia in pregnant women and comparison with non-pregnant women. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2021; 6 (2) :72-80 [DOI:10.30699/jogcr.6.2.72]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research by Farname Inc is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jogcr.com/.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research (JOGCR)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Piblisher: Farname Inc.