Write your message
Volume 7, Issue 6 (November - December 2022)                   J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res 2022, 7(6): 554-562 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ayyoubzadeh S M, Ahmadi M, Khounraz F, Ahmadi M, Pourhamidi R, Abbasi S. Requirement Analysis of mHealth app for Pregnancy Care and a Framework Suggestion for Evaluating Pregnancy Mobile Apps. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2022; 7 (6) :554-562
URL: http://jogcr.com/article-1-615-en.html
1- Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Administration and Resources Development Affairs, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5- Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Bam, Iran
6- Department of Laboratory Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , sakineh4612004@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (250 Views)

Background & Objective: There are a lot of apps for pregnancy care using mHealth technologies. However, it has not been studied which criteria in these apps are essential for increasing the quality of these mHealth programs in pregnant women. Thus this study aimed to review the desirable features of mobile-based pregnancy care applications and provide a model to evaluate existing applications.
Materials & Methods: Features of a mobile-based pregnancy app were designed using a qualitative approach. In this research, an open questionnaire was developed. Obstetricians and gynecologists filled out this questionnaire. After thematic analysis of the questionnaires, the obtained items are embedded into a general framework for evaluation mHealth.
Results: Fifteen gynecology and obstetrics experts participated in this study.  Eight themes were obtained from 34 items mentioned by the experts. Finally, a specialized framework for evaluating mHealth apps for pregnancy care is proposed.
Conclusion: To design mobile-based pregnancy care app and evaluate the existing apps in the field of pregnancy, the provided indicators can be used. This framework and other similar specialized frameworks could be developed to improve the quality of the mHealth apps.

     
Systematic Review: Original Research | Subject: Maternal Fetal Medicine
Received: 2022/01/15 | Accepted: 2022/02/23 | Published: 2022/09/9

References
1. Kreps GL, Neuhauser L. New directions in eHealth communication: opportunities and challenges. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(3):329-36. [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.013] [PMID]
2. Tate DF, Finkelstein EA, Khavjou O, Gustafson A. Cost effectiveness of internet interventions: review and recommendations. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38(1):40-5. [DOI:10.1007/s12160-009-9131-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Goldzweig CL, Towfigh A, Maglione M, Shekelle PG. Costs And Benefits Of Health Information Technology: New Trends From The Literature: Since 2005, patient-focused applications have proliferated, but data on their costs and benefits remain sparse. Health Aff. 2009;28(Suppl2):w282-w93. [DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w282] [PMID]
4. Mosa AS, Yoo I, Sheets L. A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12(1):67. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-12-67] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Organization WH. mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies: World Health Organization; 2011.
6. Dansharif AR, Iyawa GE, Owoseni A, Iyawa R. mHealth for Self-Management in Pregnancy: Perceptions of Women in Low-Resource Settings. Procedia Comput Sci. 2021;181:738-45. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.226]
7. Dantas LO, Carvalho C, Pena C, Breda CC, Driusso P, Ferreira CHJ, et al. Mobile health technologies for the monitoring of menstrual cycle: A systematic review of online stores in Brazil. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022;48(1):5-14. [DOI:10.1111/jog.15082] [PMID]
8. Espinosa MCS, Lauzurique ME, Alcazar VRH, Pacheco BLC, Lubian MdCM, Cala DC, et al. Maternal and child health care in Cuba: achievements and challenges. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018;42:1.
9. Blakeney EL, Herting JR, Bekemeier B, Zierler BK. Social determinants of health and disparities in prenatal care utilization during the Great Recession period 2005-2010. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):390. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2486-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Wallwiener S, Müller M, Doster A, Laserer W, Reck C, Pauluschke-Fröhlich J, et al. Pregnancy eHealth and mHealth: user proportions and characteristics of pregnant women using Web-based information sources-a cross-sectional study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(5):937-44. [DOI:10.1007/s00404-016-4093-y] [PMID]
11. Tamrat T, Kachnowski S. Special delivery: an analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(5):1092-101. [DOI:10.1007/s10995-011-0836-3] [PMID]
12. Shin D, Song WO. Influence of the Adequacy of the Prenatal Care Utilization Index on Small-For-Gestational-Age Infants and Preterm Births in the United States. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):838. [DOI:10.3390/jcm8060838] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Osterman MJ, Martin JA. SystemTiming and adequacy of prenatal care in the United States, 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67(3):1-14.
14. Fonseca F, Peixoto H, Braga J, Machado JM, Abelha A. Smart mobile computing in pregnancy care. 2019.
15. Musgrave LM, Kizirian NV, Homer CSE, Gordon A. Mobile Phone Apps in Australia for Improving Pregnancy Outcomes: Systematic Search on App Stores. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(11):e22340. [DOI:10.2196/22340] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Frid G, Bogaert K, Chen KT. Mobile Health Apps for Pregnant Women: Systematic Search, Evaluation, and Analysis of Features. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(10):e25667. [DOI:10.2196/25667] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Chan KL, Chen M. Effects of Social Media and Mobile Health Apps on Pregnancy Care: Meta-Analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;7(1):e11836. [DOI:10.2196/11836] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Aker JC, Mbiti IM. Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. J Econ Perspect. 2010;24(3):207-32. [DOI:10.1257/jep.24.3.207]
19. Ezenwa C, Brooks L. Understanding the Introduction and Use of a Mobile Device‐Supported Health Information System in Nigeria. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries. 2014;62(1):1-20. [DOI:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00445.x]
20. Ahmadi M, Ayyoubzadeh SM, Abbasi S. Digital health tools for prenatal care in COVID-19 pandemic. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2022;7(3):12. [DOI:10.30699/jogcr.7.3.254]
21. Burgess A, Breman RB, Bradley D, Dada S, Burcher P. Pregnant Women's Reports of the Impact of COVID-19 on Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, and Infant Feeding Plans. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2021;46(1):21-9. [DOI:10.1097/NMC.0000000000000673] [PMID]
22. Scott KM, Gome GA, Richards D, Caldwell PHY. How trustworthy are apps for maternal and child health? Health Technol. 2015;4(4):329-36. [DOI:10.1007/s12553-015-0099-x]
23. Bert F, Giacometti M, Gualano MR, Siliquini R. Smartphones and health promotion: a review of the evidence. J Med Syst. 2014;38(1):9995. [DOI:10.1007/s10916-013-9995-7] [PMID]
24. Henriksson P, Sandborg J, Blomberg M, Alexandrou C, Maddison R, Silfvernagel K, et al. A Smartphone App to Promote Healthy Weight Gain, Diet, and Physical Activity During Pregnancy (HealthyMoms): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8(3):e13011. [DOI:10.2196/13011] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Nouri R, S RNK, Ghazisaeedi M, Marchand G, Yasini M. Criteria for assessing the quality of mHealth apps: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(8):1089-98. [DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocy050] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Hussain A, Mkpojiogu EO, Fadzil N, Hassan N, Zaaba ZF. A mobile usability evaluation of a pregnancy app. J Telecommun Electron Comput Eng. 2018;10(1-11):13-8.
27. Lee Y, Moon M. Utilization and Content Evaluation of Mobile Applications for Pregnancy, Birth, and Child Care. Healthc Inform Res. 2016;22(2):73-80. [DOI:10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.73] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Woo Y-W, Cho K-W. A model for evaluating confidence and satisfaction of health information web-sites. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2006;6(9):42-9.
29. Halili L, Liu R, Hutchinson KA, Semeniuk K, Redman LM, Adamo KB. Development and pilot evaluation of a pregnancy-specific mobile health tool: a qualitative investigation of SmartMoms Canada. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018;18(1):95. [DOI:10.1186/s12911-018-0705-8] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research by Farname Inc is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jogcr.com/.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research (JOGCR)

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb | Piblisher: Farname Inc.