Volume 7, Issue 3 (May & June 2022)                   J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res 2022, 7(3): 254-255 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

1- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perinatology Unit, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Laboratory Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , sakineh4612004@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (716 Views)

Pregnant women are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 than the general population. Furthermore, COVID-19 increases the preterm and cesarean rates due to maternal and fetal complications. Owing to the adverse effects of the COVID-19 on pregnant women, in-person prenatal visits face challenges. Thus, alternative solutions that reduce the number of visits while preserving maternal and fetal care quality should be considered. Digital health is one of the potential solutions. Obstetricians and gynecologists, and other clinical experts should cooperate to define digital tools’ requirements and standards for prenatal care. Moreover, governments and healthcare insurances should facilitate the coverage of provided services’ costs by digital health tools, especially in developing countries.

Full-Text [PDF 115 kb]   (191 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (93 Views)  
Systematic Review: Letter to the Editor | Subject: Maternal Fetal Medicine
Received: 2021/09/1 | Accepted: 2021/10/17 | Published: 2022/01/12

1. Wastnedge EA, Reynolds RM, van Boeckel SR, Stock SJ, Denison FC, Maybin JA, et al. Pregnancy and COVID-19. Physiological reviews. 2021;101(1):303-18. [DOI:10.1152/physrev.00024.2020] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Pediatrics AAo. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Obstetrics. Maternal and fetal medicine: guidelines for perinatal care 3rd ed Elk Grove Village (IL): American Academy of Pediatrics. 1992.
3. Van Den Heuvel JF, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, Van Solinge WW, Lely AT, Franx A, et al. eHealth as the next-generation perinatal care: an overview of the literature. Journal of medical Internet research. 2018;20(6):e202. [DOI:10.2196/jmir.9262] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Marko KI, Krapf JM, Meltzer AC, Oh J, Ganju N, Martinez AG, et al. Testing the feasibility of remote patient monitoring in prenatal care using a mobile app and connected devices: a prospective observational trial. JMIR research protocols. 2016;5(4):e200. [DOI:10.2196/resprot.6167] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. van Zutphen M, Milder IE, Bemelmans WJ. Integrating an eHealth Program for Pregnant Women in Midwifery Care: A Feasibility Study Among Midwives and Program Users. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e7. [DOI:10.2196/jmir.988] [PMID] [PMCID]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research by Farname Inc is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jogcr.com/.